Five mistakes that quietly sink entry-level applications
Most graduate applications fail for reasons that have nothing to do with the candidate's ability. Here are the five that come up again and again.
1. Applying to roles that were never open to you
If the description asks for two years and you have none, an excellent application does not change the outcome. Check the requirements first.
2. Sending the same CV everywhere
You do not need a rewrite per application. You need the top third of the page to match the language of the posting: same words for the same skills.
3. Applying three weeks late
Many teams review on a rolling basis and stop when the shortlist fills. Applying within the first few days of a posting is worth more than any amount of polish afterwards.
4. Treating the process as fire-and-forget
A short, specific follow-up a week later is normal and often works. "Still interested, here is one thing I would bring" beats silence.
5. Not tracking anything
Without a record of where you applied and when, you cannot follow up, you cannot see which kinds of role respond, and you re-apply to things you already tried. A spreadsheet is enough. Something purpose-built is better.
Get five verified roles every Friday
Free, one email a week. Every role has been read in full and asks for no prior experience.